And the winner is…..

posted on January 30th, 2009 - Filed in Uncategorized - No comments »

Time for the Big Payoff folks !!!

If you’re just reading this blog for the first time — here’s the scoop….read my blog….and you have the chance to win fabulous prizes !!!!  

All you have to do, is send me an email with your name, address and daytime phone #….in the “subject” column put “ABC” — and you will automatically become part of:

    “ANDREW’S BLOG CLUB”

(( my email: andrew.schultz@chumtv.com ))

 

Then, once a week, I will pull a “winner” from the members — and that winner will be announced RIGHT HERE….

Case in point:    VIVA VILISTUS !!!   our first ABC winner !!!

Viva, your DOUBLE PASS (4 tix total !!) to the Calgary Premiere of “Confessions of a Shopaholic” – which takes place on Wednesday, February 11th is in the mail now !!!

Remember folks – you can’t win, if you don’t enter – so get on it !!!!!!!!!

Other than that – what can I tell you?…..big day on Monday – will he, or won’t he – no, I’m not talking about the Bachelor — Monday is GROUNDHOG DAY — will we be in for 6 more weeks of winter, or will we get an early “get out of jail free card”???   WATCH BT to find out !!!

OH – on the topic of “The Bachelor” – as you may, or may not know – I am a BACHELOR FREAK….one of my most favourite shows in the world — you have to get on board…it is pure madness…and the best TV on TV.

Here, for anyone who will listen, is my TOP 3 PICKS for finalists (in no particular order):

>>MELISSA     >>JILLIAN   >>MOLLY

Write ‘em down friends….start your office pool….and thank me later.

“The Bachelor” – Monday’s: 9pm on Citytv.

We’ll catch up next week,

-A

ps. I can’t believe my sister Jessica hasn’t entered the ABC club yet – what’s up with that?

The Politics of Irrelevance: Jack Layton

posted on January 30th, 2009 - Filed in Uncategorized - No comments »

  Canadian politics has had more than its share of angry men and women.

  Back in 1962, Saskatchewan Liberal leader (and later two-term Premier) Ross Thatcher attempted to kick in the door of the provincial legislature, which had been locked by the NDP government at the height of the medicare crisis.  The door was unharmed and remained barred but Thatcher spent the next several days limping around on a badly bruised foot.

  In 1997, Reform MP Darrell Stinson offered to roll up his sleeves and trade punches with a backbench Liberal on the floor of the House of Commons.  The bout was forestalled by the Speaker in the first instance, and by cooler Reform Party heads in the second.

  Occasionally, the angry men have animated their observations with humour.  Drummond Clancy, a Tory MP from 1958 to 1968, was infuriated by the criticism of an opposition member and so rose somewhat unsteadily from his Commons seat to put the following inquiry:

  “Mr. Speaker, would it be out of order to describe the honourable member opposite as a son of a bitch?”

  The Speaker advised such language would indeed be out of order and unparliamentary. 

  “I thought so,” said Clancy, and sat down.

  There was the Liberal ratpack of the 1980s and 90s:  Sheila Copps, who once tried to climb over a table to get at a government committee member: Don Boudrias, Brian Tobin, John Nunziata. 

  Across the aisle we had Brian Mulroney, whose anger over the collapse of both the Meech Lake and Charlottetown constitutional accords found expression in raving monologues about the imminent foundering of the country.  (Mulroney remained prone to outbursts even after leaving office.  He appeared on videotape at the annual Parliamentary Press Gallery Dinner a couple or three years ago, and with his stentorian delivery at full volume, instructed author and critic Peter C. Newman to “go f___ yourself.”  The expletive was undeleted, and Mulroney evidently considered his counsel to be wildly funny.  The room was enveloped in embarassed silence).

  The angriest of them all, though, is the tiresome little popinjay named Jack Layton, who’s in charge of the increasingly irrelevant New Democratic Party of Canada.  Layton is running around Parliament Hill these days braying about the disintegration of that putative opposition coalition which would have relied on the seditionist Bloc Quebecois for sustenance and survival.  Not incidentally, it would also have provided Layton and five of his NDP colleagues with seats at the cabinet table. 

  The proposed coalition, now mercifully extinct, was the only opportunity Layton has had to acquire real political influence in Canada.  But the new Liberal leader, Michael Ignatieff, pulled the rug from under Layton’s busy little ambitions and left the NDP exactly where it belongs:  an inconsequential rump, which is what it’s always been and always will be. 

  Layton visibly seethes, scowls, pouts and barks, and he’ll doubtless rail on about the “new coalition” between Ignatieff and Prime Minister Harper.  He’ll nag and hector about how the Liberals, and the Conservatives too cannot be trusted.  (The NDP has already launched a series of radio advertisements denouncing Ignatieff and the Grits).  Layton is like a blunderbuss, scattering political grapeshot all over the Hill and hitting nothing.  He’ll drive us all to the verge of nausea with the weary shibboleths so beloved for so long by the NDP (ordinary Canadians, working Canadians, kitchen table Canadians), all the while ignoring incontestable political data which tells us the people of Canada have almost no interest in the gloomy mists of left wing mantra. 

  We need only look at the NDP numbers, which reveal 48 years of electoral mediocrity.  Since its formation in 1961, the party has contested 16 federal elections and managed in only one of them to attract 20 percent of the popular vote.  One ballot in five.  That was in 1988 when the rational and scholarly Ed Broadbent was leader, but since then New Democratic vote percentages have descended to customary levels, generally hovering in the mid to high teens. 

  It follows, then, that results have been no different for the rash and ill-tempered Layton, whose three campaigns have returned sixteen, seventeen, and eighteen percent of popular support.  Not even the one ballot in five, and yet Layton rackets on about the millions of Canadians who voted NDP and by God his party will attend to their interests and concerns by opposing everything in sight.  Including, one notes, the federal budget of three days ago:  Layton declared his steadfast opposition to the document without even having seen it. 

  That tells you something about this man.  It tells you he’s wholly without perspective, if he indeed had any to begin with; he’s stubborn, selfish, laden with hubris, and as a politician who would embrace the Bloc Quebecois as coalition seatmates, he’s altogether unprincipled. 

  Bernard Levin, the splendid correspondent with the Times of London, was moved to observe in 1963 that the British prime minister of the day, Harold Macmillan, was in all respects “the stag at bay, with the mentality of the fox at large.”

  That’s close to a good fit, but not quite.  Jack Layton is the stag, to be sure, bellowing and foaming, but he’s not so cunning and sly as the fox.

  More like an annoying gnat, whose greatest public service now would be to go away and stop bothering the nation.

Review: ButtKicker

posted on January 25th, 2009 - Filed in Uncategorized - No comments »
The ButtKicker lets you "feel" the bass of your favourite movie, game or music

The ButtKicker lets you "feel" the bass of in your favourite movie, game, or music

So you have a 60″ plasma, a 7.1 surround sound system, and theatre chairs. You have everything you need for your home theatre right? Not quite. Just when you thought you purchased the last piece to your home theatre setup…along comes the ButtKicker.

The ButtKicker is a low frequency audio transducer. In english now, it’s a device that works with your subwoofer to help you “feel” the bass in your theatre chairs. When the subwoofer begins to rumble, your chair rumbles as well.

Setup is quite easy. You can have the entire system put together and ready to go in about 10 minutes. Instructions are fairly straight forward, if you’re familiar with how a surround sound system works.  For those of you who aren’t, it may take 10 minutes longer. Really not that tough.

So how does it work? Actually quite well. The ButtKicker really does change your home theatre experience. Now instead of hearing explosions during your favourite movie, you feel them. Your chair will rumble along with any deep bass in the flick you’re watching. We aren’t talking about a vibrating chair here. This doesn’t feel like a cheap massage chair.  The rumble is deep and changes depending on the audio you hear. Your chair may rumble for 5 to 10 seconds during an explosion, while a car door slamming will last only a brief moment. You can also increase or decrease the intensity of the vibration to your comfort level. (No one wants to have their teeth rattling while watching a movie!)

While many movie buffs will get a kick out of the device, gamers will really take a liking to it. First person shooters and action games really come to life with the ButtKicker. Play with it for 30 minutes or so, then turn it off and you’ll notice a distinct difference. Die hard gamers will fall in love with it! Music lovers, don’t worry, you haven’t been left out. There are actually three modes on the device. Movies, games, and music. Set it to music and the ButtKicker will rumble along with the bass on your favourite tunes!

The device does give off some noise. After all it does vibrate quite a bit. To counter this you can purchase rubber isolating discs to place underneath your chairs. These act in two ways. One, to make sure the vibration stays in the chair and doesn’t transfer into the floor. Two, it reduces the noise that would be created by a chair vibrating on a floor. These are a must, and do a great job in making sure your floor doesn’t rumble.

Over all I was quite impressed with the ButtKicker. My one complaint would be the system itself can become expensive if you want to add this to each and every chair in your home theatre. Each chair will need a separate motor and will set you back about $200. A standard system that will create rumble for one chair is about $500. You would be looking at close to $1000 to get all your chairs rumbling! I should mention you can also use this on a sofa, but by the time the vibration travels the length of the sofa it is lost at the far end. Only the person sitting near the motor will get the true “ButtKicker experience.” You will need two motors for most couches to get any real effect.

Another issue is looks. While the ButtKicker Amp is fairly small it is too big to slide under some chairs and sofas. While the manufacturer suggests cutting the dust fabric on the bottom side of your sofa, in some cases that just isn’t an option. My theatre chairs are simply too low to the ground to hide the unit, so they are noticeable to anyone walking in the room. I have had plenty of people ask “what is that black box attached to your chair for?”

I will also point out there were a few times the unit I was testing simply stopped working. A quick reset of the unit brought it back online (still haven’t figured out what was causing the problem)

The bottom line…if you are looking for a way to take your home theatre experience to the next level, ButtKicker may be just what you’re looking for. Yes, it sounds gimmicky. In fact I guess it is. But it is surprising how it changes the feel of an action flick (I didn’t try it with a drama or romance so can’t comment on that LOL).

The Good:

Easy setup
You can control intensity of rumble
Wireless (optional)
Adds to home theatre experience


The Bad:

Not easy to hide the amp and motor
May need more than one motor for your setup
Pricey: $500 for one chair or sofa (add $200 for each additional chair)

For more information on the ButtKicker check out the companies website: www.thebuttkicker.com

Overboard: The Inauguration

posted on January 23rd, 2009 - Filed in Uncategorized - 1 comment »

  With hope and optimism and good feelings and all washing over the United States of America this week, it’s perhaps a bit querulous to mutter about the cost of installing Barack Obama as President, but I’m not alone. 

  The guy who owns the local garage said the other day “Y’know, I thought there was a recession on down there, but they’re spending $170 million dollars on this inauguration?  Where are their heads at?”

  On the evidence I’d say in the sand, especially since that $170 million dollar estimate remains an “estimate,” so when all the invoices are in and paid the final total  –  if anybody can figure it out  –  will doubtless end up at $200 or maybe $300 million dollars. 

  And for what?  A trudging ritual, is what, which had pretty well everybody in America, and probably around the globe complaining by midweek they were “Obamaed Out.”  The objective seemed to be how many balls, the Home States Ball, the Commander in Chief Ball, the Eastern Ball, the Western States Ball, and six more could be inflicted on a President and First Lady.  Furthermore, did an increasingly heavy-lidded TV audience have to endure anchors twittering endlessly on about how Michelle Obama was “shimmering in a floor length, one shoulder gown embellished with floral accents from top to bottom” and designed by some fashion type in New York nobody’s ever heard of?  And was it critical that we be advised over and over again that Joe Biden is 66 years old and the first Catholic vice-president of the Republic?

  It was mostly unthinking and uninteresting rubbish, although let’s be clear.  I lived with my family in the United States long enough to understand  Americans hold three things to be immutable.  They have their flag and their constitution and they have the Office of the President and Commander in Chief.  Those three combined equip the American people with a patriotism not found in most other countries, and certainly not in Canada.  (An important distinction here:  opinions of the President himself, or probably before too long herself, vary from near-adulation as with Obama to profound distaste as with his predecessor.  The Office, though, is sacrosanct).

  But U.S. citizens are also in a sense so ensnared by the folklore of flag, constitution, and the Office of the President, they’ll willingly put up with a colossal inauguration bill to verify the nation’s identity, and by extension their own. 

  You’d think, though, that in the midst of dangerous economic conditions which have cost hundreds of thousands of jobs and badly weakened Americans’ confidence in their financial security, there might have been some political leadership, some thought given to scaling down the inauguration rite of passage, which is what it is, by a point or two.  With far less money spent, the flag, constitution, and Office of the President would have still remained intact as those vital American tenets, or markers of democratic citizenship. 

  But the point has evidently been lost on the U.S. government which appears determined, not unlike organizers of the Super Bowl, to make every inauguration bigger and better than the last, so the $170 million dollar, or higher “bigger and better” bill to affirm those three simple principles of the U.S. Republic now comes due.  Perhaps Barack Obama, if re-elected in 2012, will awaken to the wretched excess of his first inauguration and order that the second be less expensive, and expansive, and therefore by scale unnecessary. 

  There is, though, at least one easily defined and immediate benefit to be seen from the ascension of President Obama to the Oval Office, and that is the concurrent departure from public life of George W. Bush.  He was there of course at his successor’s swearing-in, looking like a senior partner in the comedic law firm Pale and Sallow, Gray and Ashen.  (Jimmy Carter, the 39th President, is now 84 years old and resembled a kid on a pogo stick as he arrived:  no less so his wife Rosalynn, who’ll be 82 this year).  Bush by comparison appeared forlorn and bewildered, as if fully aware his presidency will be ranked in history as possibly the worst ever. 

  But that’s for historians themselves to judge in due course, as they assess the wreckage of the war in Iraq and the destruction wrought by the arrogant swine in charge of U.S. financial institutions while Bush held office.  For now, we rejoice in the disappearance of Bushisms which established fresh standards for tortured syntax and tormented misspeak.  As in “They misunderestimated me.”  As in “Rarely is the question asked;  is our children learning?”

  And the classic:  “I remember meeting a mother of a child who was abducted by the North Koreans right here in the Oval Office.”

  You have to figure a man who can barely speak English would be ill-equipped to lead the most powerful English speaking nation on earth.  One suspects those historians, for that reason and many others too,  will eventually deem it to have been so.

BT’s Most Read Blog !

posted on January 20th, 2009 - Filed in Uncategorized - 1 comment »

OK….

That may be “wishful” thinking – but now, I am going to put it into motion…

Ladies and Gentlemen…I introduce to you A.B.C. “Andrew’s Blog Club” – kind of clever how I put those 3 letters together, isn’t it.

I endeavour to write more on this blog – and to “entice” you to read it - I will be giving away random prizes !!

What prizes you ask? (like I can really hear you ask that).

Well….Movie Passes, BT Toques, Useless Crap and if I need to – I will just start stealing stuff off of Dave Kelly’s desk.

Here’s the scoop……and it’s 2 fold……so, pay attention.

1. Email me: your Name, Address and Daytime Telephone Number (Put “ABC” in the subject line).

Send your email to:  andrew.schultz@chumtv.com

2. Once a week, I will do a “random draw” – pulling the name of one of the “ABC” Members.

Then, sit back (watch BT of course!) and check in with my Blog once a week – I will be announcing the weekly winner right here !!!

-A

Metallica lets out dirty little secret

posted on January 16th, 2009 - Filed in Uncategorized - No comments »
Metallica

Metallica jumps the gun and announces release date for Guitar Hero: Metallica

We knew it was coming…just didn’t know when. Now rock icons Metallica have let the cat out of the bag.  According to the band’s website, Rock Band: Metallica will hit store shelves March 29th on the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3.

Yup, another Guitar Hero game, this time featuring Metallica. The game is expected to feature 28 songs from the group plus tracks from other well known artists. It will also offer an “expert-plus” drum mode.

For those of you with a Wii or Playstation 2, you’ll have to wait a bit longer. The game is scheduled to hit those consoles in early May. As for those across the pond, sorry, you’ll have to wait until March.

Anyone tired of Guitar Hero yet? Aerosmith released it’s own copy of Guitar Hero, now Metallica. How many more bands will release their own version?

The Gangs of Calgary

posted on January 15th, 2009 - Filed in Uncategorized - 2 comments »

  In the late 1970s and on into the 1980s, midtown Manhattan, primarily around Times Square, was a fetid sump of hustlers, prostitutes, pimps, porn shops and peep shows, panhandlers, three-card Monte card sharks, squeegee kids, graffiti artists, scammers, drunks, addicts, illegal street vendors hawking fake or stolen merchandise, dirt, trash, broken glass.  And punks.  And gangs. 

  Downtown New York, in a phrase, had become nearly uninhabitable.  If you stopped in at Eddie Condon’s jazz club on West 54th Street, just off 7th Avenue, or Jimmy Ryan’s next door and stayed until 3 AM, or maybe longer some mornings, a legendary doorman named Gilbert Pinkus  –  who always appeared out of nowhere, it seemed, in front of both clubs  –  would stop you on your way out and say “I’ll have a cab for you in a moment, Sir.”  If you suggested well, no, the hotel is only four blocks away, Pinkus would persist:  “It’s not safe, Sir, and the cab will be here right away.”

  It always was, and even with a meagre four block fare, the cabbies had no problem because they’d just circle back to West 54th, and wait for Pinkus to corral some more club patrons.  Then maybe there’d be a long trip down to south Manhattan, or on a really good morning, over to Jersey. 

  You dared not walk anywhere.  But beginnning in 1993, newly-elected Mayor Rudy Giuliani and the Police Commissioner at the time, Bill Bratton, took Manhattan by the scruff of its grimy neck, and cleaned it up.  They started with the “Broken Glass” approach, which held that if smashed windows all over New York were replaced almost immediately, and then if necessary repaired again and again, the opening message to the lowlifes would be you”re not going to go around messing with this town any more.  Then they went after the graffiti artists, and the squeegee kids, the panhandlers, the vendors, and all the rest of them.  They moved the porn business out of midtown to a warehouse district at the far end of the Bronx. 

  And then, with a considerable measure of financial support from the U.S. government, Giuliani and Bratton got serious about policing.  By the close of the 1990s, there were 7,000 additional cops on the streets of New York, while at the same time Bratton rewrote the manual for police strategies, tactics, and above all, the code of conduct.  It was, in the view of University of California sociologist Frank Zimring, “the most focused form of policing in history,” and it put a cop on just about every corner in the city. 

  The result was a reduction of 57% in overall New York crime, a 65% decline in murders, and for five straight years, an FBI ranking as the safest large city in the United States. 

  It still is, which brings us to Calgary, Alberta, Canada, in 2009.  You can’t walk half a block downtown without being hassled by a stoned or drunk panhandler.  There’s a 24-hour stroll flanking the East Village, there’s open drug dealing all over the downtown core and along 17th Avenue, the squeegee kids are on the corners, and the recently-closed Cecil Hotel was so menacing even the cops themselves said undercover work in the bar was very dangerous.  Calgary has more than its ration of graffiti, and you’re likely to step on foul, used syringes in just about any downtown park or back alley.  But beyond all else, there are two gangs with guns, and not the slightest hesitation about using them. 

  A 24-year-old Brazilian exchange student named Jose Neto can tell you all about the guns.  He was blinded last September by a goon’s stray bullet which caught him on the side of the head when all he was doing was walking through the downtown with his girlfriend.  Keni S’ua would be another man who could talk about guns, but he can’t because he was killed on New Year’s Day outside a strip mall on Macleod Trail.  S’ua was an innocent witness to what’s carefully described as “a gang-related killing” inside a restaurant, where all he was doing was having lunch.  But because he saw what happened, the shooters “gang related” murdered him, too, as he stepped out the door. 

  Without putting too fine a point on it, Police Chief Rick Hanson is in some respects the Bill Bratton of Calgary, and Dave Bronconnier the Rudy Giuliani.  In the 13 months since he became chief, Hanson has pointedly insisted something has to be done about the justice system, which bails known gangsters back to the streets a couple of hours after the cops run them in.  He needs 400 additional officers for a city whose police-to-population ratio is the worst in the country.  He’s raised the alarm for months about armoured vehicles, and drugs, and guns. 

  Bronconnier is onside, and has been pushing the Alberta government to wake up and smell the stench of gang crime.  But Premier Ed Stelmach, fully clothed in his robes of governance “for all Albertans,” has responded with blurred and indecisive musings about his “safe communities strategy,” which is probably all right for Red Deer or Stettler, but ignores the incontrovertible evidence that downtown Calgary is manifestly unpleasant, and certainly not safe.  Not any more. 

  And besides, says Stelmach, the criminal justice system is a federal government responsibility.  The obvious questions would therefore be why hasn’t he been pounding on the Justice Department doors in Ottawa?  And in particular, why hasn’t he been going after the Senate, whose Liberal majority has devoted its entire recent life to blocking a Conservative government crime bill?

  Stelmach doesn’t get it, is why.  The Premier glides from city to city, town to town, country fair to country rodeo in a chauffeured limousine or government aircraft, occupies the gilded cage (with apologies to Judy LaMarsh) otherwise known as the Alberta Legislature, and never sets foot in downtown Calgary, or Edmonton for that matter, without a brigade of handlers and security men to keep the dregs at a distance. 

  No such cocoon for the rest of us, Mr. Premier.  We’re fed up to the teeth with what’s happening to downtown Calgary, but notwithstanding your Three Blind Mice approach to gang warfare thus far, you will presumably permit a suggestion. 

  Acquaint yourself, Sir, with the outstanding recent example of North American urban policing, sitting right before your eyes. 

  It’s called New York City.  You can look it up.

Review: Sony PRS700

posted on January 14th, 2009 - Filed in Uncategorized - 22 comments »
Sony PRS700 offers more features than the original model

Sony's PRS700 offers more features than the original model

It’s been about a year since Sony released its first eBook Reader to the Canadian market. Now the company has released a 2nd revamped edition with even more features than the first.

The PRS700 is elegantly designed. It’s bound in leather to give you that “real book” feel. It’s light weight and very user friendly.

Setup is simple. Just install the Sony software on your computer, then click and drag your electronic books onto the device through the user interface. Not only will the PRS700 displays books, it will allows you to load your own photos, even music onto the device (you can listen to tunes while you read).

The screen is very easy to read. It uses Sony’s E Ink technology. Basically it looks like you’re reading an actual book rather than a computer screen. Very easy on the eyes! This newer model also has an LED light which illuminates the screen so you can read in the dark. It’s not backlit. The light illuminates the screen from the side so the display remains easy on the eyes. You know where I’m coming from if you’ve ever done any reading on a laptop in the dark!

Battery life is quite impressive. One charge will give you up to 7500 page turns. This is courtesy of the new E Ink technology which is very energy efficient.  Of course battery life is shortened when you use the built-in light (but it’s LED so you still get a lot of usage out of a single charge even while using the light)

Another new feature on this model is the touch screen display. Now to turn a page you simply swipe your finger across the screen. I must say this gives the eReader more of a “book” feel. I can’t tell you how many times I would try and flip the pages on the original model only to flip the unit over and remember…this is not an actual book. The swipe feature gives a more satisfying feel…just like reading an actual book. You can also set bookmarks and search for keywords or phrases using the onscreen keyboard.

So where do you get the books? Well Sony has launched it’s own online store. The older unit ONLY allowed you to read book purchased from Sony’s store. The PRS700 now accepts eBook from other vendors, a nice change! You can cram about 350 books onto the devices internal memory. There is also a slot for memory cards to add even more books if you wish.

There are a few areas I feel could be improved.  I wish the unit was wireless. The Amazon Kindle (Amazon’s eBook reader) has Wi-Fi built-in so you can download books from any wireless hotspot. You can not do that with this unit. You must connect to a pc or laptop to get new content on the device. The price is also a bit hefty. At $399 the device is priced for early adopters rather than the mass market. Those looking for a bargain will have to settle for last years model which is now selling for $299.

Overall I’m quite impressed with the PRS700. It almost feels like your reading a real book, not a downloaded copy. If only it was cheaper…

The Good:

Great design
Touchscreen
Built-in reading light
Good battery life
Now supports eBooks from other vendors

The Bad:

Pricey at $399
No Wi-Fi

High Speed Retreat

posted on January 13th, 2009 - Filed in Uncategorized - No comments »

     Federal finance minister Jim Flaherty was calm and reassuring back late November, when he enclosed his annual fiscal update with predictions of a modest budget surplus, and a Canadian economy that would withstand the worst of the unfolding global economic disaster.  And it was Mr. Flaherty’s relatively cheerful advice to Canadians that they ought not to worry excessively about their RRSP portfolios, pensions, and savings. 

     Mr. Flaherty, and his boss, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, hadn’t reckoned on the righteous indignation of the federal opposition parties, who as you’ll recall, threatened to defeat the Conservative government on a confidence motion, and then form a coalition to reinvigorate the economy. 

     (The real cause of opposition fury, of course, was the Harper/Flaherty proclamation that taxpayer subsidies to all political parties would cease forthwith.  In the ordinary course, that might well have been a good move, if only because it would put an end to western and central Canadian financial support for the Bloc Quebecois.  But to in effect dare the opposition to react, while presiding over a minority government, was a tactical error of the first magnitude by Messers Flaherty and Harper, and it nearly brought the government down.)

     The Prime Minister, of course, bought himself some time by proroguing Parliament, which brings us to today (January 13th) and a portrait of a government retreating, at astonishing speed, from its obdurate bullheadedness of a month ago.  Harper and his senior ministers are canvassing far and wide throughout the land, asking for advice from business leaders, provincial politicians, environmentalists (although not Elizabeth May), unions, farm and agriculture folk   —   and to some extent, from freshly hatched Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff. 

     Harper himself, though, appears indisposed to speak at any length about this newly-discovered need for consultation.  He appeared for 30 minutes of largely innocuous chatter on Calgary talk radio, but was otherwise out of reach for perspiring media who trailed around after the PMs entourage in a futile effort to obtain a word. 

     That’s hardly surprising for a man whose government cannot escape the real truth of its circumstances.  It either misread, or worse, ignored the economic klaxons sounding all over the planet last fall, and was quite prepared to canter blithely onward with its soothing forecasts of a Canada largely immune to international economic turmoil. 

     But the deepest cut of all is this:  Stephen Harper, even though he won’t admit it, is substantially at the beck and call of Michael Ignatieff, and to a lesser extent, the irrelevant ideology of Jack Layton and the NDP.   “Consultation,” in the world of Conservative politics, is not exactly a voluntary process, but it’s been forced upon the Prime Minister, just in case….in case….that coalition emerges from hiding.     

     The result will be a budget, on January 27th, which we are advised will be the biggest in Canadian history.  It will drive the nation into deficit, where none was seen by Mr. Flaherty in November, and it will impose on the country a significant diet of Liberal/NDP fiscal policies which run counter to the Prime Minister’s essential beliefs, but will be vital to his political survival. 

     It’s simple, really:  “consultation” is the code word for a Prime Minister who wishes to keep his job.  One is reminded of the late Louisiana governor Huey Long, who said more than half a century ago “now is the time for all good men to rise above principle.”

Your new HDTV is already old…

posted on January 13th, 2009 - Filed in Uncategorized - No comments »
Samsung's Ultra High Definition LCD TV

Samsung's Ultra High definition LCD TV

In the begining there was Standard Defintion…and it was good. Then came along High Defintion. Yes…it was better. Now make way for a new format, Ultra High Definition.

Samsung unveiled its new line of TVs at CES. Among the entries, one capable of showing off Ultra High Defintion. The set has a resolution of 4096 x 2160, that’s over 4x the resolution of 1080p. Does it look nice? You bet! Is this where things are going? Time will tell. Not sure people are willing to trade in their brand new HDTV sets just yet!